Essay on Case Analysis - 784 Words

Overview Bill Thompson, a general manager at GenCorp is faced with a tolerance and diversity dilemma in relation to a possible formation of a religious network group affiliated with his company. In the newly acquired New Orleans, Louisiana, GenCorp plant workers are forming a Christian network group organized by plant manager, Russell Kramer. Two years ago, Russell Kramer spread insensitive, anti-gay literature two about how homosexuality lifestyle is an abomination. The gay employees at the time were angry and frustrated. For background, this religious network group is not the first network group for GenCrop. GenCorp’s creation of a self-organized social support, network groups for minority employees allowed several employees to†¦show more content†¦Furthermore, Bill’s boss, Becky O’Connor, made a great point that other groups such as Muslims or Buddhists could feel left out or hurt by the group. Issue #2: Decide if GenCorp should change the policy where network groups could not engage in proselytizing or any activity that is disrespectful to other employees and how to enforce it. When Bill Thompson spoke with the head of HR, Mike Turall, Mike pointed out that a network group is to help minorities to feel less isolated in the workplace. Furthermore, company policy allows network groups to form wherever employees want them. On one hand, requiring network groups to not engage in proselytizing or disrespectful activity would be hard to track and measure. Employees will have differing opinions on what is disrespectful or even how the network group is influencing the company agenda and culture. On the other hand, having more detailed and specific criteria for what can be a company-sponsored network group will be beneficial to avoid future issues with these affinity network groups. Issue #3: Should religion be kept as a private matter, even in the South where it is in open, daily conversation? As GenCorp’s nondiscrimination clause states, the company does not discriminate against company staff on the basis of their race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, gender, age, marital status, ability, or veteran status. Therefore, forming a group basedShow MoreRelatedCase Study : Case Analysis : Case Study2888 Words   |  12 PagesRunning head: CASE ANALYSIS 1 CASE ANALYSIS 9 Case Analysis (Author’s name) (Institutional Affiliation) Introduction The case is about Modrow Company, the subsidiary of Tri-American Corporation based in Canada. The branch has 1000 employees whose primary function is fabricating aluminum. The advantages of Modrow are its locationRead MoreImp Case Analysis739 Words   |  3 Pagesâ€Æ' 1. Would a TNA be needed in this situation? Why or why not? If yes, who would you want to talk to? Training Needs Analysis is a formal process required for the purpose of identifying the training gap that is in existence and its related training need. Considering the IMP case analysis, training needs analysis is required since there are different sectors within the organization which require an individual to possess the necessary skills to perform the expected work within that department. InRead MoreCase Analysis: Dave Armstrong (a)648 Words   |  3 PagesOrganisational Behavior Case Analysis: Dave Armstrong (A) Case Summary: This case is about Dave Armstrong, a 29 year old second year MBA student of Harvard Business School. Immediately after his graduation from a small liberal arts college in Texas, he started working for Thorne Enterprises as a computer Programmer. After eighteen months in the job, he quit to go into life insurance business in Amarillo. He applied to Harvard Business school but hadn’t considered what he would do, once acceptedRead MoreHow to Prepare and Present a Case Analysis5797 Words   |  24 PagesPART 6 Strategic-Management Case Analysis How to Prepare and Present a Case Analysis CHAPTER OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter, you should be able to do the following: 1. Describe the case method for learning strategic-management concepts. 2. Identify the steps in preparing a comprehensive written case analysis. 3. Describe how to give an effective oral case analysis presentation. 4. Discuss special tips for doing case analysis. Oral Presentation— Step 1 Introduction (2 minutes) Read MoreBussiness Analysis: The Affinity Plus Case Essay972 Words   |  4 PagesIntroduction In this case analysis the company Affinity Plus will be examined. Affinity Plus recently implemented a new control system. The implication of this new control system resulted in more employee latitude. The consequence of this new system was that resources and time of the organization were used in excess of what was supposed. To solve this problem, MOE (Member, Organization, and Employee) was introduced as a guideline of the chronological sequence that should be taken into account whenRead MoreCase Analysis : You Get What You Put In1015 Words   |  5 Pages6. Case Analysis – You get what you put in A recurring theme that I noticed in COMM 101 was the emphasis on the application of class concepts in the real world. The case analyses often touched on the core teachings and truly tested my knowledge by requiring me to apply everything that I had learned thus far. To be quite honest, it was a rough awakening to university, as I knew my performance was below my regular standards; it reflected my personal effort. A key takeaway from the individual assignmentsRead MoreA Typical Design : Summative Case Analysis1211 Words   |  5 PagesA Typical Design: Summative Case Analysis Luis Navarro, Jr. Southern New Hampshire University A Typical Design: Summative Case Analysis Formulating a concise and effective design can often be exacting to an organization and of an industrial and organizational (I-O) (e.g., organizational consultant, or OC) practitioner/psychologist. This is especially true when an organization is attempting to initiate a program focus on individual development, specifically to address translation ofRead MoreEssay about week 6 case analysis705 Words   |  3 PagesWeek 6 Case Analysis MKTG 301 1. Harris told Houston that he needed a couple of weeks to think about his proposal. How should Houston handle this? Harris is using what is called a time objection also known as stalling technique. In this particular case study Harris already has the need fulfilled by a different supplier and while they have had a few late deliveries Harris need to determine if it worth going through all of the work to get set up a new vendor. The time objection is oftenRead MoreTerracog Case Analysis2219 Words   |  9 PagesTerraCog Case Analysis Part 1 Analysis The situation of dysfunction during meetings in TerraCog is obvious. Both the participants and the facilitator don’t play professional in the meetings and they don’t have necessary communication with others before the meeting. All these poor performances make all meetings which are described in the case study has very low efficiency and cause so much negative emotion amount team members. Primary and secondary tensions Primary tension comes from the unfamiliarityRead MoreCase study analysis paper1396 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿ Case Study Analysis Amanda Zuber COMM215 JEANNINE BUCKLEY Case Study Analysis June 16, 2014 Executive Summary ABC Inc. hired 15 new employees with the intention of starting the orientation on June 15. Carl has only six months experience and has made several critical errors. This may have been created due to lack of qualifications, training, or overstating of qualification on Carl’s resume. Due to this, certain tasks were not addressed in a timely manner. Four problems are readily

Comparison Of IFRS to GAAP Essay - 1192 Words

Comparing IFRS to GAAP Albert Payne ACC/290 11/14/2014 Daniela Trudel Comparing IFRS to GAAP This paper looks at relevant comparisons of IFRS, â€Å"International Financial Reporting Standards† and GAAP, â€Å"Generally Accepted Accounting Principles†. These two frameworks of accounting principles and practices share a lot of standards and procedures, but also differ on accepted policies. This paper will answer those standards and differences but also show the comparison of the two. Let’s look at what ways does the format of a statement of financial or position under IFRS often differ from a balance sheet presented under GAAP. IFRS â€Å"International Financial Reporting Standards† doesn’t command a precise order of†¦show more content†¦U.S. GAAP allows for write-downs to be made using categories of items and like IFRS, does allow write-downs to be performed on an item-by-item basis. When certain conditions are met, IFRS allows inventories that were previously written down to market value to be reversed. On the other hand, reversals of inventory write-downs are prohibited under any circumstances in U.S. GAAP. So we see the similarities and also the differences in these two bodies on inventory postings. Do the IFRS and GAAP conceptual frameworks differ in terms of the objective of financial reporting? This would be a no because, GAAP and IFRS maintain very perspectives on the neutrality of financial data. These influential groups agree that financial reporting data should be relevant and authentically represented. Figures that are important would be anything useful in the eye of an investor, creditor, or regulator. Data that is faithfully represented should follow industry standards and assessments have a duty to be conservative. There are commonly used terms that are used under IFRS that are synonymous with common stock and balance sheet. These terms are; Balance Sheet is synonymous with the â€Å"Statement of Financial Position† and Common Stock is normally branded as â€Å"Share Capital Ordinary† on IFRS financial statements. Also lets look at under IFRS, can the definitions of revenues and expenses include gains and losses? Revenue in IFRS is used toShow MoreRelatedA Comparison Of Ifrs And Gaap978 Words   |  4 PagesA Comparison of IFRS and GAAP Numerous oversight organizations implement and monitor the generally accepted accounting principles, also referred to as GAAP, of their individual countries. GAAP are in place to maintain a level of consistency between the reports of individual firms, Issues arise, however when a company operates in several countries. To address these problems, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) developed the International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS. TheRead MoreGAAP vs. IFRS comparison1264 Words   |  6 PagesGAAP/IFRS Financial Statement Comparison Through this course we have been taking a closer look into the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The book lays out the major similarities and differences between the two separate but equal accounting methods. I say, â€Å"Equal†, in the sense that the IFRS and GAAP accounting methods are two different ways that the any company that could come to the conclude the financial statementsRead MoreComparison of Canadian Gaap and Ifrs1624 Words   |  7 Pagesto report under Canadian GAAP and instead use IFRS. This paper discusses three accounting topics to compare Canadian GAAP with IFRS. The three topics cover (1) conceptual framework, (2) property, plant and equipment, and (3) financial statement presentation. Conceptual Framework Both IFRS and Canadian GAAP are based on similar conceptual frameworks. Many of the basic concepts in IFRS (e.g., the going concern assumption, accrual accounting) are similar to Canadian GAAP. Many recognition and measurementRead MoreSimilarities and Differences. a Comparison of Ifrs and Us Gaap33264 Words   |  134 PagesSimilarities and Differences A comparison of IFRS and US GAAP October 2007 PricewaterhouseCoopers’ IFRS and corporate governance publications and tools 2007 IFRS technical publications IFRS Manual of Accounting 2008 Provides expert practical guidance on how groups should prepare their consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS. Comprehensive publication including hundreds of worked examples, extracts from company reports and model financial statements. IFRS News Monthly newsletterRead MoreSimilarities Between Ifrs And International Financial Reporting Standards Essay813 Words   |  4 PagesIn this research project, we will be comparing the similarities and differences between IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) and GAAP(Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), specifically in the cash flow statement, and we will be using Apple vs Samsung’s financial statement and stock price to compare the similarities and differences between IFRS and GAAP. 2. Motivation(Vicki) Today, with increasing globalization in the business world, many investors are looking for opportunitiesRead MoreUS GAAP vs IFRS Essay884 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿US GAAP versus IFRS Due to the controversy economies have had towards which method to use for accounting, there has been a compromise to converge the two most commonly used methods – GAAP and IFRS. However, these two methods are still very different. The convergence project has yet to be completed; in the meantime, more and more countries are running towards the IFRS since it is more reliable and relevant. The main difference between these two methods is the US GAAP is rule-based while the IFRSRead MoreGaap Vs. Ifrs Standards1366 Words   |  6 PagesGAAP vs. IFRS Standards GAAP generally accepted accounting principle The Financial Accounting Standard Board issues GAAP, which focus on the practices of US companies. GAAP is known as the common set of rules, standards and procedures for accounting used in financial reporting. â€Å"GAAP is the combination of authoritative standards (set by policy boards) and the commonly accepted ways of recording and reporting accounting information† (Investopedia.com, 2003). Companies follow GAAP rules to clarifyRead MoreInternational Financial Reporting Standards And The United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles942 Words   |  4 PagesReporting Standards (IFRS) and the United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP). Secondly, it will provide the needed information to transition the financial statements of Amazon.com Incorporated to the IFRS from its current reporting standards as outlined by the U.S. GAAP. Thirdly, it will provide an in depth analysis of the changes that will be made to the financial statements. Finally, it will outline the visual differences between the U.S. GAAP and the IFRS balance sheet financialRead MoreGaap Vs Gaap And Ifrs1135 Words   |  5 PagesCurrent GAAP GAAP is an acronym for Generally accepted Accounting Practices. These a common set of accounting standards, principles and procedures that are used by companies while compiling their financial statements. A combination of standards set forth by policy boards and the commonly accepted ways of recording financial information, GAAP is deemed necassary or companies to generate investor confidence. Any fundamental investor looking at a company for long term prospects looks for consistencyRead MoreThe American Institute Of Accountants862 Words   |  4 PagesIn 1939, the AIA also known as The American Institute of Accountants formed the Committee on Accounting Procedure that issued 51 accounting research bulletins and began the process that eventually became known as the GAAP. In 1957, the American Institute of Accountants was renamed AICPA or American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The AICPA or American Institute of Certified Public Accountants formed the Accounting Principl es Board in 1959, which issued their 31 APB Opinions. The FASB

Case Study of Pepsico-Free-Samples for Students-Myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Food and Berverage Company of your chosen Organization. Answer: Introduction Pepsico is one of the largest Food and Beverage Company all across the globe and manufactures different beverages and snack food to achieve the retail sales. In 2007, Indra Nooyi became the CEO of Pepsico and since then it has achieved several accolades and prizes. The company has been ranked in the top 25 best global brands and ranked number one for Green Award by the Environmental Protection Agency. In the present paper, the case study of Pespsico India has been evaluated. In the recent years, the company has realized its responsibility towards the business environment and made several initiatives for the same. These changes have also benefitted the company in terms of financial profitability. Pepsico has expanded the product portfolio and included several healthy food products. It has also washed the image of the company. Previously, the company was known for the carbonated drinks, which are not good for health; however, the recent expansion in the product portfolio has successful ly changed the image of the organization. Along with it, the company has also shifted to the healthy ingredients so that it can offer more healthy products to the customers. The present paper has discussed the extent of obligations of the business organizations for the society. It has also evaluated how much trade-off can be conducted to achieve the obligation towards the society. The Extent of Obligation of the Company for the Societal and Ethical Responsibility Over the years, the company has established its brand by diversifying the product portfolio and designing an effective branding strategy. Pepsico has evolved from a low price leader to a lifestyle drink brand, which has established a substantial market share of the organization. Nooyi adopted the strategy of the performance with Purpose, which states that the private organizations have the responsibility to fulfill the environmental, social and the ethical responsibilities. The performance is the ability of the organizations to deliver superior and qualitative financial performance to the investors of the company (Ruggie, 2017). The purpose refers to the companys commitment to the human sustainability. The company takes initiatives to manage the natural resources, establish sustainable talent and workplace safety and investment in the operational areas of the organization. It can be critiqued that it is the responsibility of the organization to address the social and the environmental challenges. The business organizations are a part of the society. They conduct business with different sections or the stakeholders of the society. The business organizations make profit due to their interaction with the society. Therefore, it is important that they give back, that they take from the society. It is also important for the long term sustenance of the organizations. If there will be no natural resources or water, these organizations will diminish. The existence of the business organizations is linked with the existence of the existence of the society and the health of the environment (McWilliams Siegel, 2001). The environmental and the social concern make the organization a single unit as the employees and the customers works as a single unit towards the welfare of the society. It is also essential in creating a positive feeling towards the organization. The employees believe a sense of purpose and that they are doing something for the welfare of the society. The organization has to develop a positive bond with the customers too, and it can only be achieved with the help of social and ethical initiatives. In the current environment of the intense competition, it is important for the organizations to take some additional initiatives for making a profit (Tantalo Priem, 2016). The level of competition allows the organizations to take the purchase decision according to the manner in which they are contributing the society. The social and the ethical initiatives also allow the organizations to provide media visibility and create a positive workplace environment for the employees. Today, most of the customers prefer to be engaged with the brands, which have taken some social initiatives (Ioannou Serafeim, 2015). Therefore, the companies are not only obliged to work for the social and the ethical issues, but it is a preferable choice for the customers. The Challenge of Resolving the Strategic Tension between Business Performance and Responsibility It can be stated that it is the preferred choice of the organizations to conduct business in an ethical manner. However, there is an underlying tension as there is a conflict of interest between the ethical and the economic interest of the business organizations. A business is developed and grown with the pursuit of the self-interest and economic profitability; however, ethics is the realization that the interest of other people is equally important. There are two sides of the debate regarding the responsibility of the business, as some people argue that the only obligation of the business is to make as much profit as possible; however, the other side of the debate states that the companies have moral responsibilities along with the responsibility of turning up the profit. Both the theories agree that the business organizations have certain responsibilities; however, there is dispute over the extent of responsibilities. The ethical issues in the business organizations refer to the di lemma which arises for the business managers regarding whether to advance the personal interest or the interest of the society (Okpo, 2013). The extent to which the Company can achieve a compromise between these different purposes In the context of large business organizations, the business managers regularly face ethical and moral dilemma. A several number of managers will face ethical issues, in the operations of the organization. If the moral code of the organization is dubious, it will affect the business operations in the long run. Therefore, it is important for Pepsico to achieve a compromise between the social concerns and the financial benefits. It is important for the organization to understand that the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives and the social campaigns can uplift the brand image of the organization (Bridoux Stoelhorst, 2014). On the other hand, immoral and illegal practices can damage the companys reputation. However, the socially responsible changes require significant amount of financial investment. For instance, when Pepsico India switched to rice brand oil, the amount of profitability decreased as it was costlier than the other types of oil. Therefore, there is compromise between the financial profitability and the social initiatives of the organization. However, there is significant difference between the for-profit and not-for-profit business organizations. If Pepsico will not try to achieve the maximum profit from its operations, it will not be justified with the shareholders or the investors of the organization. Milton Friedman has given the famous shareholders theory, which states that it is the responsibility of the business organizations to make the maximum profit. This theory does not agree that the business enterprises should take the social responsibilities and invest in activities, which are that of social interest. The only responsibility of the business organizations is to invest in the interest of the shareholders (Antonelli, D'Alessio, Cuomo, 2017). The sole responsibility of the business organizations is to be concerned about the interest of their investors, while abiding the basic rules of the society. The corporate executives should work in the benefit of the investors and in their capacity as a businessman; they should act in the interest of the employers, even though some other action is preferable for the interest of the community. Along with it, it is challenging to exercise the social responsibility as the business managers have to properly allocate the resources of employer for the social purpose. On the other hand, the stakeholder theory emphasize that the business managers must be considerate of the ethical rights of the different stakeholders and must not violate them. The stakeholders should be focused on the legitimate rights of the different stakeholders. The stakeholder theory emphasize on the moral values, idealism and the long term relationship base on the foundation of organization, society and the community. It means that the business managers should be considerate of the interest of the stakeholders, even if it reduces the profitability if the organization. Therefore, the business organizations should try to maintain a firm balance between the philanthropic activities and the profit pursuits (Carroll, 2015). The managers of the company should not do anything to make a profit, and they should not bend to increase profits through unethical means. Pespsico should try to make a specific budget for the CSR activities so that it should not focus on philanthropic activities. The stakeholders theory ultimately aims for the existence of the organization. Finding a Balance between the long-term objectives and the short-term objectives In the present competitive world, it is a challenge for Pepsico to sustain the present competition and make long-term plans for the growth of the organization. Another challenge in the formulation of the long-term and short-term objective is to align them so that they result in the growth of the organization. The long-term objectives are the strategic plan for the future growth in the upcoming ten to twenty years. It encompasses the management of the natural resource and enhancing the employee welfare in the organization. It creates a sustainable workforce, which is engaged with the organization. It is the primary responsibility of the CEO or the management of the organization. It is a major challenge to articulate the financial goals of the organization with the mission and the strategy of the organization. The business goals, mission and objectives are imposed by the shareholders of the organization. The business practices are also rooted in the values and the philosophies of the top management. However, despite the importance of the strategic objectives of the organization, the financial objectives are so apparent and tangible, that these organizations make profitability the focal point of tension and disputes at a higher level. It is important to gradually mature the principal product line of the organizations and develop the market in the similar manner. The companies can remain successful and maintain a sustainable position, only if develop strategies for the long-term sustenance of a healthy share in the market (Tai Chuang, 2014). Therefore, in order to maintain harmony between the long-term and short-term objectives, it is important that the company do not give maximum priority to the financial returns of the organization (Flammer, 2015). Moreover, the company should be adaptable to the economic and the competitive environment changes. Pepsico also changed to reinvent its image in India. It introduced several products, which can appeal to the Indian taste buds. The CEO of Pepsico has also understood that maintaining the financial objectives of the organization is a never-ending process, in which the competing and the conflicting priorities of the organization should be balanced. Currently, the corporate business environment is very unstable and can rapidly change according to the shift in the power of the market forces. Pepsico should also understand it and build its innovation capabilities. In the recent years, the customers have become highly aware and want to be associated only with the companies, which are concerned about the environment. Therefore, Pepsico is engaging in these activities and using it to connect with the employees and the customers. Pespsico India could be accused of ethical washing rather than a genuine commitment to do the right things With the analysis of the case study, it can be posited that Pepsico India has a genuine commitment to engage in environmentally and socially responsible activities. The CEO and the top-level management of the organization understand that the organization has the responsibility towards the environment and; therefore, several actions have been taken for the same. A few products in the newly introduced healthy product portfolio have not been successful; still the company is continuing them. In addition to it, the company is also concerned about its supply chain and believes that it is the responsibility of the organization to assure that the lower section of the supply chain are treated in an effective manner. If the company has been engaged in ethical washing, and was not genuinely concerned about the welfare activities, it could have been identified from its CSR activities. Although these activities have been crucial in developing a bond with the employees and the customers, the purpose of the organization is not to use them in promotion and advertising campaigns. It has made huge investment in adapting into sustainable operations so that different benefits can be passed to the customers of the organization. Additionally, it has made the changes in the supply chain so that the sustainable actions can be performed by the business organizations. The company has also invested in establishing a dynamic and sustainable workforce. Several efforts have been taken to recruit and select the talented workforce in the organization (Schwartz, 2017). They are also provided training so that they can grow with the organization and develop themselves. Summary In the present, the case study of Pepsico India has been analyzed, which has recently taken several ethical and socially responsible initiatives. It has been argued that these actions of the company are genuine and not made to portray an excellent image. The company has made several initiatives such as expanding the product portfolio, switching to healthy ingredients and developing a sustainable workforce so that it can give back, what it has taken from the community. It is argued that social and ethical initiatives are the responsibility of the organization as they are the part of the society. The stakeholders theory also posits similar belief and states the financial profitability should not be the sole aim of the organizations. References Okpo, O. (2013). The Conflict Between Profit And Ethics In The Business Of Journalism In Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management 5(10), 155-162. Schwartz, M. S. (2017).Corporate social responsibility. Routledge. Tai, F. M., Chuang, S. H. (2014). Corporate social responsibility.Ibusiness,6(03), 117. Carroll, A. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility.Organizational dynamics,44(2), 87-96. Antonelli, V., D'Alessio, R., Cuomo, F. (2017). Beyond Stakeholders Theory: Financial reporting and voluntary disclosure in Italian SME according to a System dynamics point of view.Economia Aziendale Online,7(4), 285-304. Bridoux, F., Stoelhorst, J. W. (2014). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives.Strategic Management Journal,35(1), 107-125. Tantalo, C., Priem, R. L. (2016). Value creation through stakeholder synergy.Strategic Management Journal,37(2), 314-329. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective.Academy of management review,26(1), 117-127. Ruggie, J. G. (2017). The theory and practice of learning networks: Corporate social responsibility and the Global Compact. InLearning To Talk(pp. 32-42). Routledge. Ioannou, I., Serafeim, G. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts' perceptions and shifting institutional logics.Strategic Management Journal,36(7), 1053-1081. Flammer, C. (2015). Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization.Strategic Management Journal,36(10), 1469-1485.

Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 introduced Essay Example

Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 introduced Paper Introduction: In this essay, I shall get down with an scrutiny of the jurisprudence prior to 1stMarch 1988, when Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 came into force in the Law of England and Wales, placing the grounds for the origin of the Act and the subsequent intents of this reform-legislation. I shall so discourse the content of the Act with peculiar focal point on its range ; i.e. who can action, who can be sued, and what sorts of amendss are recoverable under the statute law etc. We will write a custom essay sample on Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 introduced specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 introduced specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 introduced specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Having made this appraisal, I shall so measure to what extent the 1987 Act has made a important impact on the jurisprudence refering to faulty merchandises, and the place of both consumers and makers in the UK, and hence to what extent I agree with the hypothesis offered that â€Å"the impact of the 1987 Act upon makers has been far less drastic than they ab initio feared.† I shall reason this essay by critically measuring Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987, and asseverating to what extent I believe the Act has been successful in accomplishing its purposes. The place prior to the Consumer Protection Act 1987: Prior to the origin of the Consumer Protection Act 1987, the jurisprudence refering to liability for faulty merchandises was grounded in common jurisprudence, with makers liability being established for the first clip in the UK by the instance of Donoghue v Stevenson [ 1 ] , and the Sale of Goods Act 1979, s13, 14 and 15 of which imply certain footings into Sale contracts refering to a seller’s duties to sell merchandises which are fit for their intent and of satisfactory quality, failure to make so ensuing in contractual liability and awards of amendss for any losingss suffered as a consequence of such breach [ 2 ] , including those originating from harm to belongings, and more significantly, amendss for any resulting personal hurt [ 3 ] . This rigorous contractual liability for faulty merchandises meant that, in instances where a Claimant wished to action a merchandiser [ 4 ] for losingss originating from faulty merchandises sold, the function of Tort jurisprudence remained instead excess, claimants merely trusting on such an avenue where the marketer in inquiry had later become bankrupt, where they wished to trust on the longer restriction periods stipulated for claims of this sort, or where the claimant was in fact non a party to the sale contract, and as such was non, by virtuousness of the rule of contractual privity, entitled to action under the Sale of Goods Act 1979. In contrast, where a Claimant wished to action a maker for losingss originating from faulty merchandises sold by an intermediary seller, the lone possible avenue available would be line of instance jurisprudence routing from the instance of D v S. Such liability was fault-based in signifier, instead than being rigorous, and as such was deemed to be out of line with the bing jurisprudence in this country. Such calls for reform are non surprising if one considers the fact that the UK was, at this clip, in the thick of a by and large consumer-driven economic market, concerned with consumer protection and the inequalities which had been identified as bing between the consumer and the corporation, and a society preoccupied with rectifying this instability. At least four major reform proposals were put frontward between 1976 and 1985 ; viz. , the Strasbourg Convention [ 5 ] , the Recommendations of the Scottish and English Law Commissions [ 6 ] , the study of the Pearson Commission [ 7 ] a nd the EEC Directive 85/374/EEC. Arguably, it was preponderantly the latter of these paperss, which compelled the legislative to take reform of makers merchandise liability earnestly, and two old ages subsequently, in 1987 [ 8 ] , the Consumer Protection Act was born, Part 1 of which purports to supply consumers with statutory rigorous liability protection from makers who make faulty merchandises for retail in the UK market place ; this provides such consumers with an alternate class of action from the fault-based liability established by the instance of Donoghue v Stevenson in the civil wrong of carelessness. Before we begin to see how successful this Act was in accomplishing its purposes and what impact this piece of statute law has had on consumers and makers likewise, allow us foremost analyze the commissariats of the Act in some item: Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 ; presenting strict tortious liability for faulty merchandises in the United kingdom: There are several facets of the statute law which we must turn to in order to determine its range. These are as follows: 1 ] Who can be apt under the Act? 2 ] What merchandises are covered by the Act? 3 ] Who can action under the Act? 4 ] What kind of harm is protected against by the Act? 5 ] What defense mechanisms are available to a qualified suspect, if any? 6 ] Can liability be excluded so that this Act has no impact on manufacturers/ manufacturers? Let us turn to each of these inquiries in bend: 1 ] Who can be apt under the Act? Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 is designed to enforce liability on the manufacturer/ assembly program of a merchandise, and non on the provider, after all, there is already rigorous liability for such retail merchants under the implied footings of the Sale of Goods Act 1979. S2 ( 2 ) of the Act lists three classs of maker who may be apt under Part 1 of the Act. The first of these is the manufacturer of the merchandise, and ‘producer’ is defined under s1 ( 2 ) of the Act as: â€Å" ( a ) the individual who manufactured it ; ( B ) in the instance of a substance which has non been manufactured but has been won or abstracted, the individual who won or abstracted it ; ( degree Celsius ) in the instance of a merchandise which has non been manufactured, won or abstracted but indispensable features of which are attributable to an industrial or other procedure holding been carried out ( for illustration in relation to agricultural green goods ) , the individual who carried out that process.† Whilst this class seems pretty self-explanatory, it should be noted that where a merchandise causes harm due to a defect in a component portion of that merchandise, both the manufacturer of that constituent, and besides the manufacturer of the merchandise incorporating that constituent will be to the full apt for such harm under this Act. The consumer can take which individual to action, or can action both parties, although, by virtuousness of the philosophy of contributory carelessness, the entire amendss awarded will non transcend the value which would hold been awarded had merely one party been sued for the faulty merchandise, i.e. each manufacturer will pay a part of the amendss, the proportions of the several parts to be determined by the tribunal in conformity with the Civil Liability ( Contributions ) Act 1978. The 2nd class of individual who can be found apt under s2 ( 2 ) of Part1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 is the â€Å"own brander [ 9 ] .† The Act defines such a individual as: â€Å"any individual who by seting his name on the merchandise or utilizing a trade grade or other separating grade in relation to the merchandise, has held himself out to be the manufacturer of that product.† It should be noted that this description is really similar to the diction contained in the EEC Directive 85/374/EEC [ 10 ] . The range of this class if suspect is non every bit broad as it may at first appear to be ; after all, for a provider to keep themselves out as the manufacturer of their points, the labelling must do the consumer really believe that it was the provider themselves who manufactured the merchandise and who would believe, for illustration, that the St Michael trade name of Marks A ; Spencer’s really produces the goods themselves, instead than undertaking a production company to make so on their behalf? Likewise, where a product-label provinces that the merchandise has been ‘manufactured for’ the company, or has been ‘selected by the company’ , this must needfully prevent the company from coming under the definition as contained in s2 ( 2 ) ( B ) of the Act, and besides hence from being sued under Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987. The 3rd class of suspect contained within s2 ( 2 ) of Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987, is the provider who has imported a merchandise from exterior of the European Union ; by virtuousness of s2 ( 2 ) ( degree Celsius ) that importer will be apt for any losingss ensuing from any defects in that merchandise [ 11 ] . I stated above that ‘S2 ( 2 ) of the Act lists three classs of maker who may be apt under Part 1 of the Act’ , and besides that ‘Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 is designed to enforce liability on the manufacturer/ assembly program of a merchandise, and non on the supplier.’ It should be noted that there is a 4th class of possible suspects contained in s2 ( 3 ) of the Act, and this is a provider who, holding been approached by a consumer and asked to place the manufacturer of a merchandise which has been purchased by that consumer from that provider, has declined to supply such information, or has failed to make so within a sensible clip. Such a provider will be held apt as if he were the manufacturer. Whilst this seems contrary to any old impressions of tortious liability, this proviso is indispensable to the smooth operation of s2 ( 2 ) and Part 1 of the Act in general ; if the consumer is unable to happen the individuality of the manufacturer, he would be unable to action for any defects. If it is the provider who has prevented the individuality of the manufacturer from being disclosed, so it seems merely just that the provider should be punished for interfering in the operation of this Act, and held apt. In pattern, all this subdivision will make is to guarantee that providers are prompt in their response to petitions from consumers sing the designation of the manufacturer in inquiry and besides more efficient in the maintaining of correct records refering to the makers of their goods, and as such, my old statements that ‘S2 ( 2 ) of the Act liststhreeclasss of maker who may be apt under Part 1 of the Act’ , and besides that ‘Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 is designed to enforce liability on the manufacturer/ assembly program of a merchandise, andnon on the provider, ’ should still be considered to be a well right description of the current jurisprudence. 2 ] What merchandises are covered by the Act? S1 ( 2 ) of the Act states that the type of merchandise which is covered under this statute law is â€Å"any goods or electricity, † goods being farther defined in s45 ( 1 ) of the Act as including â€Å"any substances [ including blood it would look [ 12 ] ] , turning harvests, and things comprised in land by virtuousness of being attached to it and any ship, aircraft or vehicle.† It would therefore look that a defect in a constituent of a edifice would ensue in the manufacturer of that constituent being apt for the attendant prostration of that edifice, whereas a builder would non be apt under this peculiar Act for defects in the edifice itself caused by his cheapjack craft. This latter averment is supported, if merely in consequence, by ss4 ( 1 ) ( B ) , 46 ( 3 ) and 46 ( 4 ) of the Act. In relation to information, it would look that information couldn’t signifier the capable affair of a claim under this piece of statute law, even though such information may be touchable in signifier [ e.g. a book ] [ 13 ] . An exclusion to this might be package ; the line between package and hardware being really hard to pull sanely ; for illustration, a modem can be package or hardware based ; if a maker of a hardware modem could be apt under this Act, so certainly so excessively could a manufacturer of the package version which performs precisely the same map. 3 ] Who can action under the Act? Any individual can action as consumer under this Act if they have suffered any losingss as a consequence of a faulty merchandise. It is irrelevant whether or non the goods were really purchased by the claimant ; as the Act provinces, consumer includes â€Å"anyone injured by the goods or anyone whose belongings was damaged as a consequence of the defect.† 4 ] What kind of harm is protected against by the Act? There is no limitation on the sum of amendss capable of being sought for decease or personal hurt, as distinguishable from the European Directive, which imposes a bound of 70 million euros. Such a limitation in UK jurisprudence would be impractical. Sing amendss for losingss fluxing from belongings harm nevertheless, there are several restrictions which operate under this Act ; s5 ( 2 ) of the Act stipulates that no losingss from any harm caused to the faulty merchandise can be sought under this Act, nor from any harm caused to any accoutrement which was supplied with the merchandise. Under s5 ( 4 ) of the Act, no liability arises under this Act unless the amendss ( apart from involvement ) would be at least ?275. There does non look to be a convincing principle for this arbitrary figure, other than that it represents an sum below which most judicial proceeding canvassers in the UK would non urge shiping on a jurisprudence suit. Finally, s5 ( 3 ) of the Act precludes liability for am endss ensuing from a merchandise which is non ‘ordinarily intended for private usage or is non chiefly so intended by the claimant. Obviously there must besides be a defect in the merchandise for liability to originate, desert holding been defined in Section 3 of Part 1 of the Act as being present where â€Å"the safety of the merchandise is non such as individuals by and large are entitled to expect.† The fortunes that should be taken into history by the tribunal when finding whether or non this definition has been satisfied include ( a ) the mode in which, and the intents for which, the merchandise has been marketed, its get-up, the usage of any grade in relation to the merchandise and any instructions for, or warnings with regard to, making or forbearing from making anything in relation to the merchandise ; ( B ) what might be moderately expected to be done with or in relation to the merchandise, and ; ( degree Celsius ) the clip when the merchandise was supplied by its manufacturer to another ; and nil shall necessitate a defect to be inferred from the fact entirely that the safety of a merchandise whi ch is supplied after that clip is greater than the safety of the merchandise in inquiry. [ 14 ] † In pattern, this criterion will be set by the tribunals, and does non depend upon public sentiment ; after all, in a litigious society, public outlook may be excessively high. For non-standard merchandises, i.e. those which are non in the signifier as intended by the maker, all the Claimant must turn out is that the merchandise was non-standard, and that the non-standard characteristic of the merchandise in inquiry was unsafe and responsible for the harm suffered. For standard merchandises, built-in dangers, such as the crisp borders of a cooking knife merchandise, should merely be protected against in so far as is sensible to make so in visible radiation of the grade of benefit enjoyed by the merchandise, i.e. would the benefit of holding a cheaper merchandise without the safety guard outweigh the benefit of holding greater safety at an increased monetary value to the consumer. Again, this value-judgement will be decided by the tribunals on a individual footing, and no preparation is offered by the Act to assist do this deliberation, and the ground for this is the frequently unquantifiable nature of the benefits involved in such hazard appraisals. Where hazards are non obvious to a consumer, so a standard merchandise may be deemed faulty on the simple fact that the maker did non supply a warning or instructions on proper usage of the merchandise. Again, there is no statutory guideline as to what grade of item in such instructions/warnings are indispensable, but a maker should mistake on the side of action to avoid liability for faulty criterion merchandises on this land. 5 ] What defense mechanisms are available to a qualified suspect, if any? S4 ( 2 ) of the Act states that if the Defendant manufacturer can turn out that â€Å"the province of scientific and proficient cognition at the relevant clip was non such that a manufacturer of merchandises of the same description of the merchandise in inquiry might be expected to hold discovered the defect if it had existed in his merchandises while they were under his control.† The logical thinking behind this defense mechanism is clear ; it would wrong in both rule and pattern for concerns to be held apt for defects that they could non perchance have foreseen [ 15 ] . In the instance of A 5 National Blood Authority [ 16 ] it was clarified that this defense mechanism will merely use â€Å"if there is no cognition of the being of the hazard in a generic sense, and one time this cognition has been acquired, the maker produces at his ain hazard, even if it is impossible to place the person, non-standard merchandises in which that hazard is present.† Other defense mechanisms available for a Defendant include where the defect in inquiry was in fact a demand by jurisprudence [ 17 ] [ e.g. where the jurisprudence requires a constituent to be present, but the really presence of that constituent has lead to the merchandise being rendered faulty ] , where the Defendant did non provide the merchandise to anyone [ 18 ] [ i.e. the merchandise had neer been distributed amongst the public ] , where the merchandise in inquiry was supplied non-commercially [ 19 ] [ e.g. the provider of a bar to a party would non be apt for defects in that bar ] , where the defect did non be in the merchandise at the clip of circulation [ 20 ] [ e.g. defects that have arisen from sensible wear and tear of the merchandise ] and that ( vitamin E ) â€Å"the defect ( I ) constituted a defect in a merchandise ( ‘the subsequent product’ ) in which the merchandise in inquiry had been comprised AND ( two ) was entirely attributable to the design of the subsequent merchandise or to compliance by the manufacturer of the merchandise in inquiry with instructions given by the manufacturer of the subsequent product.† 6 ] Exclusion of Liability: Can liability be excluded so that this Act has no impact on manufacturers/ manufacturers? Section 7 of the Act invalidates any efforts by a maker or manufacturer to restrict or except their liability â€Å"by any contract term, by any notice or by any other provision.† This does non nevertheless preclude manufacturers and assembly programs apportioning hazard of liability amongst them. Inferences and decisions: My illations and decisions shall be provided in response to the undermentioned inquiries: A ] To what extent has the 1987 Act made a important impact on the jurisprudence refering to defective merchandises? B ] To what extent has the 1987 Act made a important impact on the place of both consumers and makers in the UK? C ] To what extent is the undermentioned statement correct? â€Å"The impact of the 1987 Act upon makers has been far less drastic than they ab initio feared.† D ] To what extent has Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 been successful in accomplishing its purposes? Let us near each of these inquiries in bend: A ] To what extent has the 1987 Act made a important impact on the jurisprudence refering to defective merchandises? In theory, Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 is one of the most of import reforms made to the jurisprudence of civil wrong in England and Wales. It purports to enforce rigorous non-fault based liability on manufacturers of faulty merchandises in line with the European Directive on Consumer Protection ( 1985 ) . In pattern nevertheless, we have seen that many defense mechanisms are available to such a manufacturer, defense mechanisms which in topographic points seem to re-impose a cogent evidence of mistake demand of a Claimant under this Act. For illustration, the defense mechanism contained in s4 ( 2 ) requires the Claimant to turn out that the manufacturer should hold known about the defect and the harm that it would do in visible radiation of the scientific cognition available to him at the clip of production. This seems more like standard civil wrong of carelessness cogent evidence demands instead than rigorous liability. I would reason that the impact on the jurisprudence is non every bit important as one might, prima facie, believe. The ‘strict’ liability, by virtuousness of the defense mechanisms available, no that far removed from the mistake demands of traditional civil wrong jurisprudence. B ] To what extent has the 1987 Act made a important impact on the place of both consumers and makers in the UK? In visible radiation of my decisions above, I would reason that so far the impact of this statute law of consumers and makers is non peculiarly important ; the responsibilities on the manufacturers of merchandises have non been well increased if one takes into history the ‘no-fault’ based nature of the available defense mechanisms in s4 of the Act. C ] To what extent is the undermentioned statement correct? â€Å"The imtreaty of the 1987 Act upon makers has been far less drastic than they ab initio feared.† In visible radiation of my decisions above, I would hence hold to reason that I agree with the above statement. D ] To what extent has Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 been successful in accomplishing its purposes? I believe that there is grounds to propose that the lone purpose of this statute law was to convey UK jurisprudence in line with the demands of the 1985 European Directive of Consumer Protection. With this in head, the purpose has been satisfied. The UK legislative antecedently refused three reform proposals bespeaking a rigorous liability attack to this country of jurisprudence, viz. , the Strasbourg Convention [ 21 ] , the Recommendations of the Scottish and English Law Commissions [ 22 ] and the study of the Pearson Commission [ 23 ] , and merely changed the jurisprudence when ordered to by the EEC Directive. I think this groundss my above proposition, as does the reading of the Directive to integrate as many of the permitted/discretionary defense mechanisms available as possible, guaranting that our civil wrong jurisprudence is non radically changed by this new piece of statute law. If the purpose of the Act was to make rigorous liability, so it has failed. If the purpose was to follow with the European Directive 85/374/EEC in a manner that would non alter our preexistent civil wrong jurisprudence into something where makers would be held apt for things beyond their sensible control, so I feel the UK legislative has achieved this purpose laudably. It is the latter of the two decisions with which I shall agree. Bibliography: Prashant, P. Defects and the CPA 1987 New Law Journal 1st December 2000. Freeman, R. Strict liability Torahs Consumer protection Act commissariats fail to help claimants in three recent instances. J.P.I.L. 2001. 1.26-36. ( Westlaw ) Gilker, P. Strict Liability for faulty Merchandises: The Ongoing Argument Business Law Review Vol 24 No4 April 2003. Winfield and Jolowicz on Tort ( 16ThursdayEdition, Sweet A ; Maxwell ) 2002 European Convention on Product Liability in Regard to Personal Injury and Death, Dir Jun ( 76 ) 5 Simon Whittaker â€Å"European Product Liability and Intellectual Products.† ( 1989 ) 105 L.Q.R. 125 DTI’s Consultative Document on the Directive 1